Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | Birejji's commentslogin

I would say fewer AND human readable lines are better. The more both can be achieved, the better.


If you would like to play Portal, Valve is offering the game for FREE (only until Sep 20): http://store.steampowered.com/app/400/


Do you mean you can only play it until that day, or you can only install it by that day?


Claim it by that day and it's yours forever


So it's guess and check on speed?


So here's something I've noticed about my own learning process: I can only learn by example. No matter how complete, precise and accurate an abstract description is, I don't understand something until I see examples. For example, when I try to understand some complicated code, I pick some representative example inputs and work out the corresponding output.

Am I alone in this?


That's exactly why I'm a programmer, and why I've always had trouble with math.

I won't say I only learn by example, but I need something tangible. Something I can pick up, squash, twist and break until I can feel what it's made of. Even if that manipulation occurs only in my head, and even if I've had to synthesise that tangibility from someone else's explanation.

For me, that's the way things really are, and anything else is an intermediate representation.

I never did learn the mathematical definition of bezier curves properly; I just looked at the animations on Wikipedia. This post kinda inspired me, so here's a scrubbing bezier curve: http://samgentle.com/playgrounds/bezier


I'm with you.

I'm very inspired by this scrubbing calculator because I think it is the perfect tool to introduce algebra. The abstract concept of a variable is not something that comes easy to everyone. This tool allows you to visualize the idea of a variable and play with it.

I think this would allow the introduction of algebra at an even earlier age for some, and make the transition much smoother for the rest.


No matter how complete, precise and accurate an abstract description is, I don't understand something until I see examples.

I believe this is why spreadsheets are so popular: you're never working with abstraction alone. It's always incarnated in an example. That seems to fit how most people's minds work. By contrast, tools that require users to specify their abstractions first and only then instantiate them with data have a much more limited appeal. It can be hard for programmers to appreciate this because we're on such familiar terms with abstraction.


I find this and near-future solar flares and coronal mass injections to be interesting experimentally. I'm waiting to see if any of them will have an effect on our tech. and the power grid. That and I'm waiting for the day I can see an aurora borealis in Chicago with my naked eye.


I could have done a lot better with that $200k :(


Don't armchair, go do. Start a project, get funded/self fund, and prove you can do better.


Ironically, the fact that he is armchair quarterbacking is exactly why he hasn't $200k to prove he can do better with.


Also, a couple of my projects have been ramen profitable which can be expanded but again... no one wants to fund


I've started lots of projects... no one wants to fund and I'm a college student without funds to self-fund


These guys were in the same position...


Dynadot is the way to go


Birejji - http://birejji.com Was earning $100/day with adsense as a normal chat site (with 2M+ impressions per Month), but adsense banned the site due to "fraudulent clicks" (I've always had a consistent CTR so no idea what happened there). Since then it's turned into a Paid to Chat site.


Unfortunately I was rejected from lijit


SAT Subject Tests: 800 pts * 4 = 3200

Actual SAT Test: 2380

Total: 5580


Thank you! I will give it a try


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: