Just don't have weak hands.

I hope someone teaches it to perform a highly sophisticated secret handshake.

Sounds like Microsoft, yes.

The CCP trying to get fertility rates up by cracking down on lesbians, paying money for children and now cracking down on whatever this is.

It's no use, though. You need a good economic and social outlook to get people to even consider having children. And this ain't it.

Indeed. Impoverished third world countries are known for having very low birthrates.

Given comparison reports between people's opinions of AI and the future between China and the US, I think it is.

Personally no amount of social outlook would want me want children. I simply don't want to have them I don't like raising or interacting with children it's just not in my nature and I really feel like a lot of that has to do with how people are nurtured.

Empty statements that only set the stage for an excuse for slowdown on model performance.

That would be the best case scenario. I honestly wish things would finally slow down a bit. I don't see it happening.

That everyone is different of special in their own way? That has no place in a classroom!!

It's usually becaise they have lower metabolism so their cells don't suffer as much damage as ours, and they probably have a lot of copies of genes that prevent cancer.

Maybe. But whales don’t get cancer either, and whale metabolism is… impressive (well their resting heart rate is lower than ours but they grow orders of magnitude faster, to a point, and sustain themselves gorging on literal tons of food).

Humans have pretty low selective pressure for cancer resistant genes (a tiny fraction of people get cancer before or during their reproductive years).

I wonder if whales survive to an equivalent of human old age (where we can be pretty fragile and still survive for decades).

> I wonder if whales survive to an equivalent of human old age (where we can be pretty fragile and still survive for decades).

They do and this is well-documented. They're one of the few (only?) other species where we can directly see the role matriarchs (grandmothers, either past their reproductive ages or even undergoing menopause) have on the development of the youth, and it's been used to explore the role of living post-reproductive ancestors might have on natural selection (which was previously not thought to be affected by it).

Maternal grandmothers have even been found to ~spontaneously regain their milk to help nurse infant whales, iirc.

Humans commonly have grandchildren in their 40s (less so recently of course). We get fragile in our 70s. I'm wondering about living decades in that fragile state, where cancer happens to be a lot more common.

That mostly doesn’t count, since humans still regularly have kids of their own in their forties (so the direct link to natural selection would overshadow any lower-pressure grandmotherly effects), so you’d have to push the window out to the post-menopausal period, which coincides with the period in which various cancers begin to be an issue.

I like the theory that whales are so big that their tumors get killed by tumors before they can spread.

Obviously they don't wanna tip the LLM

Imagine being a developer of the torment nexus only to be beaten to the IPO by the rival torment nexus company.

People working for those companies have either drank the koolaid or have equity enough to play along until they can cash out.

I imagine saying you're developing skynet is better than saying you are developing a very cool, extremely expensive to run chatbot that can do math and code.