Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | RattlesnakeJake's commentslogin

> ...someone cute might see me reading and become interested in me.

Did it work? :)


"The Adventures of a Free Lunch Junkie" by Earl Bronsteen:

https://a.co/d/0b7sZ26V

It's an old guy writing about accepting every "Sit through our seminar and get a free lunch" offer that came his way. I found it hilarious.


"Guild" might have been a better choice :)

Noted! I'll keep it in mind, it's a great suggestion.

I had a Lumia with 512MB of RAM. The OS ran great, but the web outpaced it. I couldn't open a lot of JS-heavy sites without Internet Explorer crashing.

> What happened next was predictable in hindsight. Employees began inflating their scores through tokenmaxxing: running meaningless tasks through AI agents to consume tokens and climb the rankings.

That was predictable in foresight.


It's a classic example of giving people the wrong incentive

Right? Make any metric meaningful for an employee, and they will find ways to maximize that metric. I thought this was a well-understand phenomenon.

That's where I've landed as well.

The current state of things is entirely the fault of the advertising industry. They've acted like users' banner blindness is an obstacle to be defeated, rather than a constraint to build around. Faced with something the users cannot change, they continue to pile up increasingly hostile techniques that only work for a short while before users start to automatically ignore them.

I'm curious where the one-sided arms race ends. Probably a return to subscriptions that frustrate users but are at least sustainably funded.


NSF is also reporting that it took out one of the lightning rod towers. It'll be interesting to see how much damage the pad and ground equipment sustained.


It was very likely the largest explosion in Florida spaceflight history. Considerably larger than when SpaceX blew up AMOS-6 in 2016, and that required a full rebuild of the pad infrastructure over 18 months.


I'm wondering about how it compares to AMOS-6. New glen is bigger than Falcon 9 & uses fully cryogenic propellant, so there would be definitively more energy involved.

On the other hand a lot of the damage on the Falcon pad was IIRC due to burning kerosene getting everywhere on the pad & melting everything.

In this case I would expect all the liquid oxygen and methane to either be involved in the explosion or quickly vaporize, possibly resulting in a different damage pattern on the pad.


I don’t believe they were using cryogenic propellant in the first stage yet. They were preparing for it just before this.


You might be confusing cryogenic with subcooling - it is still cryogenic (or it would not fit into the tanks at any reasonable pressure), just colder and more dense (you can fit it a bit more than if its at a higher, still cryogenic temperature).

He built it for himself first, posting frequently about it on X. Once it reached a point of stability, he announced that Basecamp was starting to transition it's employees from macOS to it.


Sounds like the "Organizational Update" meeting that meant I was getting laid off :)


Check out Standard eBooks. They take the text from Gutenberg and add a level of polish to the ePubs.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: