The comparison to dreaming reminds me of a comment in Information Theory, Inference, and Learning Algorithms:
"One way of viewing the two terms in the gradient (43.9) is as 'waking' and 'sleeping' rules. While the network is 'awake', it measures the correlation between x_i and x_j in the real world, and weights are increased in proportion. While the network is 'asleep', it 'dreams' about the world using the generative model (43.4), and measures the correlations between x_i and x_j in the model world; these correlations determine a proportional decrease in the weights. If the second-order correlations in the dream world match the correlations in the real world, then the two terms balance and the weights do not change."
"One way of viewing the two terms in the gradient (43.9) is as 'waking' and 'sleeping' rules. While the network is 'awake', it measures the correlation between x_i and x_j in the real world, and weights are increased in proportion. While the network is 'asleep', it 'dreams' about the world using the generative model (43.4), and measures the correlations between x_i and x_j in the model world; these correlations determine a proportional decrease in the weights. If the second-order correlations in the dream world match the correlations in the real world, then the two terms balance and the weights do not change."