Despite all the equations, it seems to me that your work didn't require any real mathematical sophistication. Did I miss something?
Yes.
----
Isn't this just a straightforward extension of an old result by Hartmanis?
Which one?
Am I missing something here? Can you identify any deep mathematical content in this work?
Yes you are. Next question.
Wasn't all this done years ago at Xerox PARC?
No, only several of the underlying technologies. Can you identify which?
Have you tested this on the chip Intel got running last week in their lab?
No, but I'm sure it will work because I helped design it.
Am I missing something? Isn't it obvious that there's a bottleneck in the system that prevents scaling to arbitrary size?
Did you miss that function isDebugOn(){ return false; } is O(1)?
Despite all the equations, it seems to me that your work didn't require any real mathematical sophistication. Did I miss something?
Yes.
----
Isn't this just a straightforward extension of an old result by Hartmanis?
Which one?
----
Am I missing something here? Can you identify any deep mathematical content in this work?
Yes you are. Next question.
----
Wasn't all this done years ago at Xerox PARC?
No, only several of the underlying technologies. Can you identify which?
----
Have you tested this on the chip Intel got running last week in their lab?
No, but I'm sure it will work because I helped design it.
----
Am I missing something? Isn't it obvious that there's a bottleneck in the system that prevents scaling to arbitrary size?
Did you miss that function isDebugOn(){ return false; } is O(1)?