Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

You will always have opportunists. This article is not about that. The specific incident described by the article is about a car going through caution tape and getting caught up in a fallen overhead powerline. There's very little chance of payouts there, though there probably should be if considerable damage was caused. When it comes to interference with emergency responders, I also doubt it being a case of people looking for payouts.

A lot of AV enthusiasts seem to be painting the world as against them, when the reality is that people don't like being unwilling experimental subjects. If there was proof that AVs were safe, I could imagine people jumping on them in droves. Why would one reject having a vehicle where you have the option to drive yourself or have the driving being done for you? (I realize this article isn't about that scenario.) On the other hand, the tech industry's mantra of moving fast and breaking things - something that existed in practice long before the likes of Facebook - has bred an incredible amount of distrust. That distrust has only grown as it has shifted from the technology itself into grand social experiments.



> If there was proof that AVs were safe, I could imagine people jumping on them in droves

These services have waiting lists.

San Francisco is simply a city that can’t help but distract from its endemic problems by torching those who bet on it. (That said, I blame these firms for choosing San Francisco.)




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: