On target perhaps, but overly sensational - any valid points they have are drowned out by the "CHEMTRAILS!!" "9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB!" "UFOS!!!" that surround it.
A much superior source is the one you linked - factual and free of sensationalistic spin.
Here's the source:
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/F?c112:3:./temp/~c112n8J...: