Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> this is not straight up a ban but it is a ban

It's really not. ByteDance isn't being sanctioned. TikTok.com will remain accessible to everyone in America. This is simply saying if it can't be sold to an American (EDIT: non-Chinese) buyer within a year, it gets removed from U.S. hosting and U.S. app stores.

> you can't claim being "the free world" by imitating China

Good thing we're not.



Right, will be interesting if France demands that Instagram be sold to LVHM, UK demands that Twitter be sold to Virgin, Spain demands that Shopify be sold to Inditex, Turkey demands that Snapchat be sold to Erdoğan’s son-in-law or else. Totally not banning though, simply be removed from the AppStore if fail To sell.


> will be interesting if France demands that Instagram be sold to LVHM

Or else be removed from French app stores yet remain available online? Without being sanctioned or blocked?

ByteDance's CEO perjured himself in front of the Congress [1]. Meanwhile, you can't Google the 1989 Tianamen Square massacre in China because (a) Google is blocked, as in actually blocked, and (b) the very term is blocked.

There are reasonable objections to this bill. Claiming we're stooping to China's level is not one of them.

[1] https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexandralevine/2023/05/30/tikt...


Does the legislation in fact specifically require sale to a US buyer, rather than a non-China buyer? Like EU buyer wouldn't fly?

Oddly, the articles I've seen don't feel the need to specify there. Seems like a big difference to me, and requiring sale to specifically US buyer seems rather more of a takeover.


> Does the legislation in fact specifically require sale to a US buyer, rather than a non-China buyer? Like EU buyer wouldn't fly?

No, you are correct. Thank you. It must simply be no longer controlled by a foreign adversary [1]. (And yes, the term foreign adversary is defined in law [2].)

An EU, Gulf or Indian buyer would be totally fine if done in good faith, i.e. without being a front for Chinese interests.

[1] https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/7521... § 2(g)(6)

[2] https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-15/subtitle-A/part-7/subp...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: