Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> but there are a lot of disasters where the cables are fine

We are talking about war-like situations, and where one state actor has incentive to cause maximum harm to another. Exposing your infrastructure like this is unlike damage that can come from natural disaster. For example, disrupting the communications exactly before the attack. Similar issues (though through lower tech hacking) happened in 7th of October during the Hamas attack in Israel, where the over-reliance on advanced, complicated technology became a liability.

The stuff you describe make sense in normal, peaceful situations, where the cost of securing certain infrastructure can be higher than the cost of a power cut once. That has nothing to do with what the article really says, which is basically that infrastructure is currently not as secure from a potential hostile state attack. Also, in that case, a hostile state actor can combine attacks that together cause more damage than the sum of the attacks independently.



What was the lower tech stuff on Oct 7?


There was a massive DDoS in Israel on 10/7, fake alerts of a nuclear missile launch were sent, and newspapers like the Jerusalem Post were taken down and temporarily defaced[0]

[0] - https://www.axios.com/2023/10/10/hackers-ddos-israel-hamas-c...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: