Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

He is probably trying to, correctly, imply that heart attacks at 51 are an anomaly given how much we know about heart attacks and how accurately tests can predict them. Especially for a person of the deceased's means.

The OP is also factually correct: "The current generation of American children may be the first not to live as long as their parents". [1] [2]

Fast food explosion is partly to blame.

[1] http://www.georgiahealthnews.com/2012/05/largely-preventable...

[2] I've heard this from at least 10 other sources first hand, especially health insurance companies.



Thanks. People don't like to be reminded of the bad news.


I didn't down vote you but I think your initial down votes were based on two things:

1) you stated your opinion as a fact. There is some research to point to shorter life expectancy but stating it as a fact that will happen no matter what seems a little strong.

2) you state that life expectancy will "plummet". Plummet indicates a very large dropoff. From what I've seen, some respected paper suggest that life expectancy might dip by a year or so.

But to have a say 10 year drop, which is what plummet would indicate seems rash as no credible scientists are predicting that.


He also provided no context and no relation to the article, so downvotes aren't surprising on HN for that.


"... He also provided no context and no relation to the article ..."

How do you know it's a 'he'? A quick scan & I can't tell.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: