You're free to classify me as foolish for this, but before clicking the link I honestly expected this to be one of thought provoking articles (as there are often ones here on a sunday), with an intentionally absurd headline.
Not to beat a dead horse, but could we be any nearer to reddit? I wish I could hear from people who upvoted this one.
Not to beat a dead horse, but could we be any nearer to reddit? I wish I could hear from people who upvoted this one.
I'm not sure who is ultimately responsible, however I think your response would definitely make the list of 0th world problems, as defined in the linked article.
The 2038 problem is someone else's fault, and I mostly use 64bit systems. Every time I implement something that assumes the year will take four digits I have a little moment of 'ugh'. The context for me was using python list slice operations to take apart a timestamp, but I now use datetime.datetime.strptime.
This mapping to numbers implies a total order on problem classes with computerists' problems being even more <lesser integer>-worldish than the plain old first world problems. I believe this is not the case. Computerists' problems are incomparable to i-th world problems, for i in {1,2,3}.
I think you missed the joke. In every day life, ordinals start at one. Formally, they start at zero (we owe their modern definition to non other than von Neumann).
A programmer's 0th world problem really is a first world problem, taking into account the fact that we count differently.
Not at all as far as I can tell. There was an inside joke for a while at Sun that the only successful languages were failed ones that you put out the source too.
Sun was going to flush the folks in the Liveoak/Java group (this was in '94) since there wasn't any practical use case for Java, James Gosling and Patrick Naughton got Sun to agree to let the source be put out there on the net so that those of us who had been working for the last few years on it could point to it when someone looked at our resume and said "what is this Oak/Java thing, never heard of it."
There are people who would hire Guy just to be able to say "Guy Steele works here." :-)
surely not so? people like that don't exactly need a cv...
[i wonder if, given the other comment about cvs, there is a subtext related to fogus trying to find a job? although i thought he just started one.]
the raspberry pi thing, though, is serious. i'm travelling to the uk next week and thought i'd pick one up while i was there. when i checked online - they're expecting stock in 5 weeks! (you can find them on amazon, but the price is significantly higher).
Only thing worth noting is that standard CPC / Farnell policy is that your first order must be shipped to the billing address of your debit/credit card, so if you're just visiting here you might need to get a friend to order it.
That's interesting. This might be the first time I've seen someone specifically choose not to link something because they find it objectionable but point out their decision in this way. I'm not sure how to react. I want to ask you to post it anyway, but that seems disrespectful given you've stated your choice so clearly. At the same time, I'm trying to disassemble the reasoning behind your decision to comment (vs not commenting at all).
Not to beat a dead horse, but could we be any nearer to reddit? I wish I could hear from people who upvoted this one.