Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I started quickly reading the article without reading who actually wrote it. As I scanned over the things being said, I started to ask myself: Who wrote this? It's probably some AI proponent, someone who has a vested interest. I had to smile when I saw who it was.


I did the same thing, I thought "This post looks like a posthumous letter".

I hope LLM use will drive efforts for testing and overall quality processes up. If such thing as an AGI ever exists, we'll still need output testing.

To me it does not matter if the person doing something for you is smarter than you, if it's not well specified and tested it is as good as a guess.

Can't wait for the AI that is almost unusable for someone without a defined problem.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: