Getting AI vibes from this article? It is strangely repetitive and meandering. Also tell-tale "It's not X, it's Y" and sort of unspecific mostly.
Also, why would you have billions of open transactions? That is the implication I got from the article as someone who doesn't know anything about Postgres.
(I use SQLite and perhaps I have Stockholm syndrome, but I like how it pushes you towards a design with small transactions, ideally entirely database-side.)
Also, why would you have billions of open transactions? That is the implication I got from the article as someone who doesn't know anything about Postgres.
(I use SQLite and perhaps I have Stockholm syndrome, but I like how it pushes you towards a design with small transactions, ideally entirely database-side.)
EDIT: Yeah, gptzero says AI with 100% confidence.