My god. It’s useful for coding… and that’s it. It’s not going to change the world the way you think.

there's no benefit to anyone for being so reductive, from whichever side you're on.

As a progressive person, the constructive thing is to try to see how to harness it for good or how to fight it, it's not to pretend that it's weak. It's not weak.

> we know pretty well at this point that this is world warping technology (either for good or bad), not a small matter of taste.

And what are you doing about it?

I professionally use it to design pharmaceutical drugs, essentially I do my best to harness the good sides of it

Not saying you aren't good at your job but this statement gives me pause. Given what I see on the daily as output from models I hope there's still a lot of human interrupt behind the wheel with respect to the design of drugs.

Every drug indeed has a huge burden of proof before it is distributed to humans, including the 3 levels of FDA clinical drug trials that cost billions of dollars, as well as all the internal testing we do beforehand.

How are models improving your process? And how do you grapple with model inconsistencies?