> Yes, Joseph Smith played a similar role to Romulus in the founding of Rome: the leader and lawgiver
No he didn't. You obviously know nothing about what his role was.
> It also seems highly unlikely that Smith simply "made up" everything as some cynical ploy for power
Literally exactly what he did, and it's well documented that's exactly the sort of person he was.
You are very uninformed on this topic.
> but there are no "Sanhedrin" documents about Jesus
> You should probably ask yourself why you keep committing gross errors of historical fact
Please just google before insulting someone that knows more about a topic than yourself.
Here's what I'm referencing [1] [2]. "In Sanhedrin 43a, the Talmud records that Jesus was "hung" because no one came to his defense for charges of practicing sorcery and apostacy."
Now that you are simply insulting me and not engaging, I'm done. Good luck with yourself.
No he didn't. You obviously know nothing about what his role was.
> It also seems highly unlikely that Smith simply "made up" everything as some cynical ploy for power
Literally exactly what he did, and it's well documented that's exactly the sort of person he was.
You are very uninformed on this topic.
> but there are no "Sanhedrin" documents about Jesus
> You should probably ask yourself why you keep committing gross errors of historical fact
Please just google before insulting someone that knows more about a topic than yourself.
Here's what I'm referencing [1] [2]. "In Sanhedrin 43a, the Talmud records that Jesus was "hung" because no one came to his defense for charges of practicing sorcery and apostacy."
Now that you are simply insulting me and not engaging, I'm done. Good luck with yourself.
[1] https://mainstreamapologetics.org/evidences/HIS-EV63.html
[2] https://www.sefaria.org/Sanhedrin.43a.20?lang=bi&with=all&la...