I just used it on 4 texts. The 1st version was the output from my first (chatGPT) prompt. The 4th was the last prompts of "reduce, make it less AI, etc" of the same original request/output.
In all cases it was meatbag. In the 1st case gave chatGPT 0.35. The remaining ones were much lower.
EDIT: I didn't ask just to generate some text. The original prompt was very specific, which is most of the time the way I use LLMs anyways. Probably it catches better the "hey just generate this email...".
I'm surprised by this comment. It's probably mostly AI generated, but I have no problem reading the first 10 pages, and I found them clear and correct.
Might be that we come at this page with different experience and knowledge. I'm not seeing any specifically hard to read AI here.
It’s shorthand for “it’s unreadable, but in the way an AI would write it”. I’m not OP, but that’s the issue. If it was well written (even if AI written), there would be no problem.
As it turns out, you still need to be a good writer in order to prompt an AI to write well.
def. AI-assisted, both content and style style/nav.
Content-wise, it looks legit, but with that amount of stuff, it's nearly impossible to say for sure.
