Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

1. The massive amounts of GPUs being purchased have far shorter valuable lifespans than a house.

2. A model's value seems to be depreciating at an unbelievable rate. The most expensive top SOTA models (GPT-5, Opus 4.1) a year ago are far less capable than GPT-5.6 Luna. Compared to when those models were new, Luna costs 85% less than GPT-5 and 98% less than Opus 4.1. That's good for us consumers, but if a lab stumbles for 6-12 months, a lot of their value goes away. Especially with open models only months behind the SOTA closed models.



I feel like the idea that GPUs wear out in 3 years is as far as I can tell, generally unfounded.

The GPU build out will keep pumping tokens until the cost to replace is less that the cost to maintain. It is effectively sunk cost.


Even if it is 5 or 7 years, houses last decades. Even cars last longer than GPUs. GPUs are a highly depreciating asset. They'll last longer than 3 years, but might not be very cost effective (tokens per Wh) compared to the latest AI accelerators that are available.

I wonder if it will be that the U.S. (and allied countries) will be using the latest 1-2 generations of AI accelerators, and if the 3-5+ year old stuff will be sold to Chinese datacenters since that will still be the most powerful tech we'll be allowed to export to them?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: